Interviews
Personal Questions
- Latest Travel: France
- Frequency: Frequent
- Prefecence F/S: Sea
Funnel Questions
- Plan Trips (currnt): Searching for tournaments, Searching for destinations Online, looking for weather, searching for interesting activities, looking at travel blocs/ Social Media. Bookinf throug specialised websites
- Comparaison of different offers such as flights/accomodation and lookinf for recomodations.
- Problems encountered: Finding affordable offeres, coordination with friends, familiy and the club, additionaly time managment.
- Important aspects: Easy to use interface, social features, feedback for POI'S
- Small groups like friends/ family or the fencing club
- Top 3 Worst things:
- Keeping an overview of the neccessary documents
- Coordinating the schedule
- Finding the affordable flight
- What makes/ breakes a Trip: Good weather, nice activities, having fun, nice accomodations,if those are not given it breaks the trip.
- Important Subjekts: Safety, Monatary Managment, Keeping track of travel dokuments, communication within the Travel Group.
- Communication Methodes used: WhatsApp, Discord
-
Modes of transportation: To arrive at destination: car/train/bus/plane. In Situ: PT or rental Car
-
Quantity of Pictures: ~25 - 50
- What type of vacation: Adventure/ Cultural Vaccation
- Travel outside of EU: NO
- Ranking of aspects:
1. Activities, 2. People, 3. Hotel/Resting
- Ranking of Features:
1. Map with planned activities 2. Plan activities for the day/whole trip 3. Weather for travel time period 4. Flight/transportation details 5. Checklists 6. Travel documents organization 7. Chat 8. Travel souvenirs (pictures/videos) 9. Voting 10. Financial management
Personal Questions
- Latest Travel: Austria
- Frequency: Semi-Frequent
- Prefecence F/S: Forest
Funnel Questions
- Plan Trips (currnt):Interesting location for the Family, Culturally Interesting Locations
- Researching, Comparing Accomodation.
- Problems encountered: Finding an accomodation that suits the entire family, Transportation
- Important aspects: Detailed activities on Family Activities, weather forcasts.
- Family (6).
- Top 3 Worst things:
- Finding no interesting activities
- Not beeing able to balance Interests and Schedules of Family memberes
- Forgetting something inportant at home
- What makes/ breakes a Trip: Enjoable Activities for everybody, good food and weather, bad trips do not meet these criteria.
- Important Subjekts: Family Comfort, Ensuring everyones Joy, keeping track of the money
- Communication Methodes used: Peronal Communication, WhatsApp, SMS
-
Modes of transportation: Plane, Car
-
Quantity of Pictures: ~50 - 100
- What type of vacation: Adventure and Relaxation
- Travel outside of EU: YES (NA, OC)
- Ranking of aspects:
1. People, 2. Activities, 3. Hotel/Resting
- Ranking of Features:
1. Checklist 2. Financial management 3. Plan activities for the day/whole trip 4. Chat 5. Weather for travel time period 6. Travel documents organization 7. Map with planned activities 8. Travel souvenirs (pictures/videos) 9. Voting 10. Flight/transportation details
Conclusion of the Interviews
What went well?
- The majority of the questions lead to satisfying answers.
- The interviewees were both patient and participated in good faith.
- No major issue that could not be fixed was encountered.
What didn't go well?
- Certain Questins where more ambigious that intendet
- Certain answers didn't go into the intended direction, which led to the fact that certain questions had to be rephrased.
- Due to the fact that there was an age gap between the two interviewees, lessons learned in the first interview weren't always applicable in the second one (e.g., after the first interview, we rephrased a question that had previously led to an error in understanding). But certain'slang' words that were unfortunately passed into the question were not expected by the second interviewee, which led to the question needing to be rephrased again.)
Conclusion of the entire Process
Thanks to our interviewees, the entire procedure went really well and without major issues. They were cooperative and answered the questions to the best of their ability. If an issue was encountered, they were patient and understanding, and after a quick modification to the question, the interview was back on track.